What approach was affirmed as necessary after a national risk assessment of various hazards?

The affirmation of an all-hazards, capability-based approach to preparedness planning arises from the need to effectively address a wide range of potential threats and hazards identified in national risk assessments. This approach emphasizes the importance of developing capabilities that can be applied across different types of emergencies instead of focusing on specific threats in isolation.

Adopting an all-hazards perspective ensures that resources and planning are not overly specialized but rather adaptable for various situations, whether they be natural disasters, pandemics, terrorism, or other unforeseen events. This flexibility allows for a more sustainable and comprehensive readiness framework, enabling agencies to efficiently utilize capabilities when responding to emergencies.

By focusing on capability-based preparedness, agencies can prioritize the development of essential skills, equipment, and resources that are relevant for multiple scenarios. This ensures a more robust and resilient emergency management system that is better prepared to handle the complexities and interdependencies of contemporary risks.

In contrast, technology-driven response strategies may overemphasize tech solutions without adequately addressing fundamental readiness, while localized response planning might not sufficiently account for larger, regional issues. Reactive emergency management techniques, which deal with emergencies after they occur rather than preventing or proactively preparing for them, fall short of the proactive stance needed in comprehensive preparedness planning.